Home > Obama Supporters > A guide to Obama supporters

A guide to Obama supporters

How to identify an Obama supporter: As you are navigating your daily business, you may come across Obama supporters. They have been known to attack (mostly verbal threats and ad hominem) unprovoked. Preferring thought over emotion and facts over slogans is something of a blasphemous crime to an Obama supporter. In addition, if you should form an opinion about Obama without his express permission, you may be accused of being a racist. The purpose of this guide is to help you identify Obama supporters before they get the chance to dampen your day.

It should be noted that there are several species of Obama supporters.

O’Zombies: With glazed eyes and vacant stares, these subdued types can generally be found online. Their speech consists of incoherent rehashes of Obama phrases and, “like” and “y’know”. After having surrendered most cognitive ability to be used as seen fit by the Obama campaign, they generally possess just barely enough to be able to upload a video to Youtube. However, some aren’t so lucky and eventually starve to death having forgotten how to eat. They are not particularly dangerous, often not even aware of your presence when you are standing next to one. Some have suggested that merely being near one or watching their videos can be detrimental to one’s IQ. Avoidance recommended.

Obamatons: Also known as obamabots. Ever since Lenin nurtured the first breeds of useful idiots, communists have continually strived to create better useful idiots – ones that were stronger, faster, more useful than the previous generation. The obamaton is one which has been upgraded to the predictability of a machine. The obamaton seeks out communications relevant to Obama on the internet then responds. There are only two known responses. If the obamaton detects a statement which is positive regarding Obama, the obamaton will respond with requests for money. If the obamaton detects a statement which is negative or even neutral regarding Obama, the obamaton will respond by shrieking “RACIST!” repeatedly. Obamatons are only found online. They are sometimes known as “trolls”. The fact that they have yet to have a spine installed prevents offline activity.

O’lattes: To understand an O’latte, you must put yourself in his shoes. An O’latte believes he’s better than everyone else. And while he enjoys sneering at poor people and chastizing those who dare to question his supreme intellect, he is somewhat depressed. “Why can’t the world be more like me?” he wonders. Then, like a ray of sunlight, Obama appears. “Hey, he thinks he’s better than everyone else just like me!” exclaims the O’latte. Finally, the O’latte finds hope, knowing he is no longer alone in his narcissism. O’lattes are not dangerous, but nevertheless extremely annoying.

Obombers: These are Obama’s enforcers. Brutish and mute, these not-so-gentle giants have been known to become physically aggressive. While their actions range from roughing up old women at rules commitees to blocking camera shots for Fox News, they invariably use force. Little is known what motivates them to serve Obama unquestioningly. Some speculate that Obama supplies them with a daily ration of gruel and they reward him with unfaltering loyalty. They are moderately dangerous.

Yeswecans: Hailing from the make-believe land of Yesweca, these Obama supporters live in a fantasy world. In that world, Obama can heal the sick, stop wars by waving his hand, fly, summon unicorns, and coat the landscape with Obama-rectal derived pixie dust. When they are suddenly torn from their parallel dimension and thrown into our world, (known as reality), they tend to exhibit wild mood swings and the negative behaviors which often accompany them. For the most part, they have a surreally optimistic view of Obama and bubble with enthusiasm. However, when confronted with Obama’s mortal enemies, facts and logic, they will lash out in defense of their deity. There have been many speculations as to the true nature of Yeswecans. Some opine that Yeswecans are best understood as cultists, (see: The Church of Obamism), while still others suggest the root to be a mental disorder, (see: Obamitis). Regardless of the cause, Yeswecans can be extremely dangerous and should be avoided whenever possible.

Obamelites: They’ve turned politics into a business and Obama is their cash cow. A number of super-delegates fit this mold. They generally cluster around Obama in a protective swarm and rarely consort with the “little” people. They are almost never seen in public but often on TV. Because of their rarity in public, they are not much of a threat in terms of individual controntation. But regarding the power they intend to wield as a bludgeon, they have great potential to damage America as a whole. In addition, they are known to betray former supporters/supportees on the turn of a dime, or, perhaps more accurately, in exchange for a dime. They should never be trusted.

Under normal circumstances, I would not assume that anyone reaches an opinion through a character flaw or extreme ignorance. But Obama supporters are an exception. Obama supporters continually slander and verbally bully those who dare to think differently than they. That is a clear indication of a character flaw. Obama supporters often know much less about their own candidate (not to mention history and geography) than the average person on the street that doesn’t even follow politics. Then there are the Obamelites. Pure greed. I suggest that Obama supporters support their Marxist candidate for personal flaws because none have yet given me another reason. If there is an Obama supporter out there with another reason, I’d love to meet that person.

And with that said, I do sympathize with Obama supporters. Some of them are Americans too (I don’t count the communists), even when they’ve lost their way. Indeed, I can only imagine their horror when they find out they’ve willfully supported a madman. As the buyer’s remorse spreads, undoubtedly many more will. Let’s be sure to catch them when they fall, not for the Democratic party, not for the Republican party, but for America.

Categories: Obama Supporters
  1. June 3, 2008 at 12:41 pm

    absolutely brilliant……eye opening [mine were already open] and funny as hell, this should wake some other people up. good job!

  2. Guamley
    June 3, 2008 at 7:02 pm

    Great insight into the darkness that is the Obama supporter.
    Funny and scary!

  3. Dawn
    June 3, 2008 at 7:05 pm

    this is so true….

  4. afuel
    June 3, 2008 at 7:05 pm

    Wonderfully concise and accurate but horrifying at the same time.

    The old adage that it “Takes all kinds and we sure got them” comes to mind.

    thanks for putting this together

  5. John Doe
    June 3, 2008 at 7:07 pm

    I just must comply! This was really funny in a sweet nutty way. But I truly doubt that anyone in the Obama-camp will understand the meaning behind this joyful piece. Obama-folks don’t think anymore. They’re just lost. Period.

  6. June 3, 2008 at 8:01 pm

    I like it. It is funny and informative.

  7. Wilhelmus Bryan
    June 3, 2008 at 8:28 pm

    Unbelievable sour grapes.

  8. Jack Foster
    June 3, 2008 at 8:28 pm

    I’m an Obama supporter, and I thought this was funny, albeit in an insulting and derogatory way. I’m not quite sure what my category is though. If I could figure it out, I might have a t-shirt made!

    How about the Obama supporter who puts millions upon millions of diverse fellow Americans into thin, uncomplimentary and caricatured categories? No wait; that wasn’t an Obama supporter; that was you! 😉

  9. fredshelm
    June 3, 2008 at 8:36 pm

    Jack Foster, it most certainly was a caricature, hence the disclaimer at the bottom. I’m not sure why you would find this problematic however, being that the mantras of the Obama movement are, “Disagree with us? RACIST!” and “Not gonna vote for Obama? U R BUSH!!”

    I’m glad you have a sense of humor.

  10. VKA
    June 3, 2008 at 8:36 pm

    One of the best satires ever! You should be nominated for Pulitzer.

  11. Jack Foster
    June 3, 2008 at 8:45 pm

    Fred wrote: “I’m not sure why you would find this problematic however . . .”

    Hey, no problem! I had to try to get you back a little bit, though.


  12. Aaron
    June 3, 2008 at 8:58 pm

    As clever as you think this is, you are saying something terribly generalizing, narrow-sighted, and completely void of any facts or statistics. While surely some Obama supporters fall into these categories, the vast majority do not. In fact, it would be just as easy to make sweeping generalizations about Clinton supporters – but I refuse to – because it would accomplish nothing. Frankly, saying that all Obama supporters are the archetypal demographic stereotype of rich, black, educated, pretentious, sexist, young & naive idealists is just as false as characterizing all Clinton supporters as poor, hillbilly, old & crotchety, unintelligent, racist, etc. People sadly need to grow up and stop parading false stereotypes. That includes supporters of all three candidates.

  13. Super
    June 3, 2008 at 8:58 pm

    I wonder how one would categorize the various clintonistas that have been with us since 1992. It may be hard, particularly when they have trouble defining what is, is and what constitutes sex! Most importantly how do we classify that obnoxious cigarette graveled voice of Harriet Christian, and her “true to clintonista form” divisive rhetoric/tirade? Hmmm I know —- BITCH!

  14. chris
    June 3, 2008 at 9:06 pm

    This is dead on, and that’s why it’s so funny! Being in DC, I’m in the hot bed of Obama land. Going to parties, I see all these types, especially the O’lattes! They’re SO sanctimonious, self-absorbed, yet want to be in the “revolution” as long as they can keep their Landrovers. Will definately circulate!

  15. Touche
    June 3, 2008 at 9:10 pm

    Fredshelm – I think you are a bit confused. You illustrated the mantras of those who stanchly support Billary.

    Disagree with us?
    Now, McCain is our candidate!
    Why is everyone ganging up on Hillary? – sob, sob, sob
    Oh – SEXIST!


  16. O'Latte
    June 3, 2008 at 9:16 pm

    I think that I must be an O’latte, because after reading this, I think, no wait, I know that I am better than you! Probably because I am part of an American revolution that will be ushered in with the swing of the pendulum. America will be great again, no matter how hard republicans try to keep us where we are, we will improve this country eventually. It will start with President Obama.

  17. sgpi
    June 3, 2008 at 9:21 pm

    An excellent summation of the Obambi supporters. I was listening to The Who’s “Tommy” today, and thought that was a pretty apt analogy too.

    “Listening to you, I get the music,
    Gazing at you, I get the heat,
    Following you, I climb the mountain,
    I get excitement at your feet”

  18. JM Gonzalez
    June 3, 2008 at 9:34 pm

    Impressive wit! Best analysis I’ve heard today…I’ll print it out, post it down at the corner coffee shop, and then run across the street and watch the O’latte bugs eat each other while trying to define which profile they match…their bumper stickers demand they match…or how else to ensure their rightful place in Bara-La-La Land…

  19. noname
    June 3, 2008 at 9:41 pm

    Please please please. What about those clueless, innocent Osama supporters from foreign lands who have started to follow him blindly without knowing of his heinous background.

    A name for them too!!!!!!!

  20. Rockyspoon
    June 3, 2008 at 9:44 pm

    So true it’s scary!! Wake up, O ye idiots (Oyeidiots is another type the author missed).

  21. Rockyspoon
    June 3, 2008 at 9:46 pm

    Obaliens: clueless, innocent Obama supporters from foreign lands who have started to follow him blindly without knowing of his heinous background.

    Osaliens: clueless, innocent Osama supporters from foreign lands who have started to follow him blindly without knowing of his heinous background.

  22. Rockyspoon
    June 3, 2008 at 9:49 pm

    Opramite: clueless, innocent Show Host supporter that wishes (from her recent ratings) she had never supported Obama.

    Opramites: clueless Show Host supporters from nether regions of this great land who follow Obama blindly without knowing why; their only sin is unthinking loyalty to the Show Host.

  23. Rockyspoon
    June 3, 2008 at 10:00 pm

    OMaStreaMeders: clueless, largely Democrat journalists and talking heads employed in the Mainstream Media that have started to follow Obama blindly without knowing of his heinous background.

    OSentoriums: clueless members of the Senate who have started to follow him blindly without knowing of his heinous background.

    OCongregoriums: clueless members of the Congress who have started to follow him blindly without knowing of his heinous background.

    OHollywormites: clueless, Osama supporters, generally living in Hollywood, who have started to follow Obama blindly without knowing of his heinous background.

  24. Larry Craig
    June 3, 2008 at 10:39 pm

    Pleas meet me in the men’s room to discuss.

  25. SeattleDem
    June 3, 2008 at 10:52 pm

    One of the best articles of the campaign! Loved it! It will come in handy (for educational purposes) if I have to go over to the McCain side and defect from the Dem party!

  26. Anonymous
    June 3, 2008 at 10:54 pm

    McBushies – Sad folks who still think that Saddam Hussein was behind the 9/11 attacks and that Toby Keith should be Secretary of Defense

    McHypocrites – People who are bound and determined to send other peoples’ kids to war cuz its the right thing to do

    McGeezers – Because anyone under 60 can’t be right for the country

    McBillionaires – Since only these folks have anything to lose from an Obama presidency in which case they would have their net yearly income cut from 10 million a year to a measly 9.75 million

    McKlansmen – Cuz his name sounds foreign and he’s gonna hand over North Carolina to Al Queda

    McIdiots – Well i got an email saying he’s a muslim so it must be true

    McSheep – They keep saying “appeaser” over and over with Obama’s name attached. They keep saying it over and over and over … *zones out* Obama … appeaser …

    McDoormats – I mean sure this party ships my jobs overseas, puts billions in the pockets of people who already had billions, caused my energy bills to skyrocket and my purchasing power to plummet, but they say values a lot. I like values. Values good. Bend me over sir, I’m sold.

    McCowards – Gay people! Ahhhh! Black people! Ahhh! Latin people! Ahhh! Quick, get out the foil hats and the Leave It To Beaver tapes! We’re heading for the hills!

  27. chris
    June 3, 2008 at 10:55 pm

    McBushies – Sad folks who still think that Saddam Hussein was behind the 9/11 attacks and that Toby Keith should be Secretary of Defense

    McHypocrites – People who are bound and determined to send other peoples’ kids to war cuz its the right thing to do

    McGeezers – Because anyone under 60 can’t be right for the country

    McBillionaires – Since only these folks have anything to lose from an Obama presidency in which case they would have their net yearly income cut from 10 million a year to a measly 9.75 million

    McKlansmen – Cuz his name sounds foreign and he’s gonna hand over North Carolina to Al Queda

    McIdiots – Well i got an email saying he’s a muslim so it must be true

    McSheep – They keep saying “appeaser” over and over with Obama’s name attached. They keep saying it over and over and over … *zones out* Obama … appeaser …

    McDoormats – I mean sure this party ships my jobs overseas, puts billions in the pockets of people who already had billions, caused my energy bills to skyrocket and my purchasing power to plummet, but they say values a lot. I like values. Values good. Bend me over sir, I’m sold.

    McCowards – Gay people! Ahhhh! Black people! Ahhh! Latin people! Ahhh! Quick, get out the foil hats and the Leave It To Beaver tapes! We’re heading for the hills!

    • madehero2007
      August 6, 2010 at 11:51 am

      Obama will and has affected more than the wealthy. It is your blatant ignorance that has allowed this man to be elected to the highest office. You were so blinded by his ability to articulate his thoughts in a fashion not before seen. He spoke in circles and many became dizzy enough to vote for him, but you were too distracted to realize that his speeches had no context.

      Now, that being said, to address your attempt at satire. I will ignore the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan because they are mostly opinion based topics. However, you are wrong quite frequently throughout your rant. We don’t send “other peoples kids to war.” If you have not realized, the majority of those in uniform are republicans and conservatives. The liberals of this nation do not fight for this nation in large numbers. This has come from witnessing first hand who makes up our military base. Again, not only the wealthy will have something to lose with an Obama presidency. Those that have endured the worst of the Obama presidency have come from the lower rungs of the economic ladder, which is why even the small business owners did not support Obama. They were not millionaires, but they saw Obama for what he was and is. As for the “McDoormats,” your previous quote of “ignorance must be bliss” comes to mind. The Democratic Party takes more from the American people than the Republican Party. However, it is the Republican Party that creates that vast majority of jobs within this nation. It is the also the Republican Party that works to keep energy costs low. Who do you think uses more energy and has to bear the brunt of the increasing energy prices? The small business owners are affected the most by the increasing energy prices, and it has been the Democratic Party that has been pushing for more environmentally “friendly” legislation, which has caused increases in energy production costs, which inevitably causes an increase in energy prices.

  28. Rockyspoon
    June 3, 2008 at 11:03 pm

    No thanks…

  29. Rockyspoon
    June 3, 2008 at 11:07 pm

    Once a Muslim, always a Muslim… If you change religion to, say, Christianity, they put a death sentence on you. There’s been no death sentence put on Obama. Anybody care to explain why? Or is it because Muslims are allowed to lie in the name of Islam in order to subvert their enemies (Christians, Jews, Agnostics, Atheists, Buddhists, etc. etc.) Any explanation on this topic would be helpful.

  30. chris
    June 3, 2008 at 11:11 pm

    He wasn’t a muslim. Ever. His father was born a muslim but Obama wasn’t and never has been. That’s why. You would know this if you bothered to research it for even 20 seconds.


    • madehero2007
      August 6, 2010 at 11:39 am

      Chris, I find it fascinating that you believe the “facts” are located at http://www.snopes.com. Do you not find it odd that the “facts” are only at the websites that post material supporting your views. Your site of reference has no credibility at all. Normally I do not use youtube as a source, but this video provides several video clips of various Obama interviews that show his true Muslim faith.

  31. Ella
    June 3, 2008 at 11:13 pm

    Can someone please explain to me what the Hillary women are so upset about? What has the Party “done” to Hillary? How has she been mistreated? I really don’t understand. The party reversed itself and changed the rules of the primary election midstream to meet her calls for including Michigan and Florida. They didn’t ignore her. They didn’t shit on her. They listened to her and voted to count both states to the extent legally possible under the rules that she subscribed to until it stopped being convenient. Obama has NEVER trashed her EVER. He isn’t winning because the party gave him the nomination; he’s winning because he’s winning…it’s an election, remember? Since when did losing an election amount to vicious mistreatment of the loser? I really don’t understand what all these women are upset about, other than the fact HIllary lost. Fine, be upset about that, it’s normal…but this level of vitriol? Is Obama’s “sweety” comment really that much worse than Clinton’s “hard-working Americans, white Americans” comment? What on earth are you all so upset about?

    – A puzzled woman

  32. chris
    June 3, 2008 at 11:23 pm

    The reason Ella, is that this is the stuff that the Clintons themselves have been saying. Only the Clintons could lose and election and claim they are more electable. That said, Senator Clinton is a strong candidate and has a very loyal base who are understandably disappointed with the result. They’ll get over it but they need time to get it out of their system. Let them have all the time they need so long as it doesn’t run past Nov 3rd

  33. S.A.L.
    June 3, 2008 at 11:23 pm

    Why then did he go to a Muslim school and recite a Muslim prayer for the media….HOPE! Change!


  34. chris
    June 3, 2008 at 11:32 pm

    *shakes head* Ignorance is bliss apparently.


    Read the facts.

  35. presto
    June 3, 2008 at 11:57 pm

    Ella, the DNC handled this very badly. Florida was ok – 50% is better than nothing – but Michigan was a travesty. Obama was not on the ballot because he chose not to be. His motives were not pure and are described in detail elsewhere. The vote allocation for Michigan was such an unbelievable violation of rules that it would likely be easy to contest before the credentials committee. According to DNC rules, “uncommitted” should be counted as another presidential preference and treated exactly the same way. Those delegates should have gone to the convention with their uncommitted status intact and then voted for their choice. Most likely that would be Obama but there were also votes there for Edwards, Biden, and Richardson. Instead, those delegates were arbitrarily assigned to Obama, based on nothing. In addition, extra delegates were assigned to him based on exit polls (!) which was unbelievable and unprecedented. And then, as a final insult, 4 delegates – representing some unknown number of voters, were taken away from Clinton and awarded to Obama. Do you not see anything outrageous in that? I would much prefer to be disenfranchised entirely than to have my vote taken away from the person I voted for and given to a person I would never vote for. There was no reason for Obama not to give her the votes she earned even if he gave himself the votes he didn’t earn. The exit poll votes and the vote hijackings were deplorable. The fury was understandable.

  36. Mike S
    June 4, 2008 at 12:02 am

    Well there must be an awful lot of us Obamanuts out there, because he leads (narrowly) in the polls, despite all the vitriol and venom directed at him. Compared to Bush/McCain, Obama is a breath of fresh air!

    • madehero2007
      August 6, 2010 at 11:55 am

      Unfortunately, there were enough of you to get him elected. I wonder if you still believe that Obama is a “breath of fresh air” compared to Bush? Seeing as how it has been well over one year since Obama was elected, and he is still using Bush as a scapegoat, you probably still believe that Bush is responsible for all the troubles of your everyday life.

  37. June 4, 2008 at 12:11 am

    This sounds like writer ripped off a Ron Paul blog and simply substituted all Paul references with Obama

  38. Lunch Admin.
    June 4, 2008 at 12:15 am

    Ha-ha – “Obama-rectal derived pixie dust.”

  39. June 4, 2008 at 12:16 am

    I am still wondering how the man who was too afraid to participate in a debate moderated by Brit Hume on Fox News is going to face down dictators armed with nuclear weapons- even if only in friendly chats.

    • madehero2007
      August 6, 2010 at 11:57 am

      Well, it is clear that he hasn’t faced them down. He has surrendered and bowed to them. This man has done nothing but weaken our nation and show the world that America is vulnerable with him in office. However, I believe that he did have an interview with Brit Hume in an attempt to peak his plummeting approval ratings. However, Brit Hume handled himself well and made Obama look like quite a fool.

    • madehero2007
      August 6, 2010 at 12:44 pm

      I would like to apologize for my previous comment. I meant to state that he has had an interview with Bret Baier, not Brit Hume. I typed Brit Hume because I was rereading your comment while typing my reply.

  40. June 4, 2008 at 12:16 am

    Mike, Dud-kakis led at this stage in the polls, too, before any debates or anything. In case you missed it, he suffered a resounding defeat. It’s early, pal.

    Fred, this is funny stuff, man! 😆

  41. June 4, 2008 at 12:28 am

    Obama the flip flop man! He is an anti-white, cigarette smoking, America hating rookie Senator. Another great Blog is


    that his been all about Obama the past two days as I have had to leave real estate subject matter because of the joke in Florida! Florida voted for Clinton, but the Dem’s just gave some of HER delegates to Obama! WOW! The same spin doctors that said the Republican’s cheated Gore out of the White House are now doing it to Clinton!

    Go McCain!

  42. June 4, 2008 at 12:29 am

    Note to Anonymous a few posts up.

    See you in the food line after Obama is elected.

  43. Erik
    June 4, 2008 at 12:39 am

    Funny that Hillary supporters bent on pigeon-holing Obama supporters into rigid categories continue to refuse an engagement on election issues. This has, seemingly, been the goal of the Clinton campaign from the start: make the election about the people running and not about the people voting. It’s sad that, in the wake of defeat, all you Clintonistas can do is equate a movement for change with fascism, as if the political climate under Republican rule hasn’t been close enough already. So fine, act on impulse instead of intelligence and go vote for McCain in November. As my roommate loves to say: I’ll see all of you ladies in the back-alley.

    Check out http://2oldformaxim.wordpress.com for more

  44. June 4, 2008 at 12:45 am

    Sort of funny. Not very original though. Sounds like recycled material from wingnut talk radio. I personally think it’s good to see lots of Americans getting fired up about fixing the problems the Republicans have created or failed to address: everything from foreign policy to climate change and energy independence to the out of control cost of health care. But, there’s always mockers, scoffers, naysayers, cynics, and nattering naybobs of negativity out there who get their jollies from this type of stuff, I guess. Good luck with your little hater blog.

    • madehero2007
      August 6, 2010 at 12:12 pm

      jr, it is clear that you have paid little attention to this nation and the political powers that have been shaping this nation. The Republican Party is not responsible for every folly that has lead to hard times for this nation. Climate change is a completely separate topic that would take far too much time to explain. I will provide one comment in saying that Al Gore is far from accurate, and the solution to our woes is not wind or solar energy. As for energy independence, that could be obtained if liberal legislation were to be removed. In a simple vitrification process, our current nuclear power plants could become quite clean sources of energy that would be able to easily power all of America; however, there are so many restrictions in place that prevent new nuclear power plants from being built and construction on existing nuclear power plants from being performed. As for health care, I would prefer leaving that in the hands of the private sector. I know that Canada is frequently referenced as the prime example of “successful” universal health care; although, it is important to keep in mind that 70% of Canadians have federal coverage and private coverage. This is because the federal coverage that is received in Canada does not cover all expenses and is quite in adequate when compared to private coverage. That being said, it is much better to have control over the coverage and costs of your plant than to put all faith in one body. Having universal health-care gives the federal government total authority. They have the power to choose your coverage and your costs, regardless of what you may want. At least with the private sector, if you do not like the coverage that you are receiving, then you have the ability to take your money to another provider. It is also important to keep in mind that you will most likely pay much more with universal health-care. It might seem like less, but that is because the money will be taken directly out of your paycheck, which means that you are not writing the check and actually seeing the full amount that you are paying. Though, this is a problem brought on by liberal policies. There has been massive expansions to federal aid, and a drastic increase in restrictive legislation that has come from the Democratic Party, which has resulted in a need for insurers to increase what they charge. If you want lower costs, then you must make it more cost effective for the provider. If a product takes more effort, time, and money to produce, then it will cost more to buy. Even the government will not provide free coverage. They won’t even provide coverage with an expectation of zero profit. The coverage that they provide will be inferior and will cost much more. If you monitored politics in America, you would know and understand that politicians are far greedier than any business or business owner ever could be.

  45. June 4, 2008 at 12:47 am

    Obama won the Democrat nomination by going as far left as he could possibly go–natural for him–and promising anything and everything to anyone who with their hand out. He’s nothing but a tin horn populist, Huey Long wannabe, trying to buy votes through social giveaway programs. And like Huey, he’ll be giving chickens out the front door while stealing them blind out the back door. Seems like a combination of appealing to greed on the one hand and nice, meaningless, feel good phases on the other is what a great many Americans want this time around. Wasn’t the word gravitas used in 2000 and 2004 when Bush was running? Now, when a light weight Democrat is running seems like no one remembers the word.

  46. June 3, 2008 at 11:04 pm

    I found the post funny and correct. Obama is just another puppet of the Chicago Daly machine. His mentor was Illinois State Senate leader Emile Jones who is the right hand man of Gov. Rod Blagojevitch. Blago is currently trying to secure himself a prison cell along side former Illinois Gov. George Ryan thanks to the Rezko trial. They are all tied together from Blago-Jones-Daly-Rezko-Obama. One big happy government run mafia.

  47. June 4, 2008 at 12:57 am
  48. subtle4mbition
    June 4, 2008 at 4:50 am

    I have a question for the poster, do you really think any of the candidates can change the US? Do you think that we need change? As interested as I am in politics, I tend towards the cynical. Anyone who thinks that things will be different because of one candidate over another are mistaken. For the most part, everthing will be the same. There will be no great differences. What we need to look at instead of insulting vast amounts of the US population, is how America can change, no who America can change. There is one truth about my countrymen I agree with, and that is that we are uninformed. No one pays attention to the news, or really follows politics, because they think it just doesn’t matter. But no, to change the US to e a better place to live and work, we just make fun of people who support other candidates, and then pat ourselves on the back for being so damn witty. Yea American democracy.

    • madehero2007
      August 6, 2010 at 12:17 pm

      I am somewhat cynical as well; however, I do have some faith in the American people and our ability to get onto the right track. My faith comes from what has occurred in the individual states, such as Arizona and Virginia. The only way that this nation can get onto the right track is if we start upholding the constitution and start supporting the sovereign rights of the individual states. Congress has become so bloated and blind to reality that they, and our president, constantly shred the constitution to pass legislation that they support. It is also important to note that America is a Republic and follows a Republican form of government, not a democracy that is so readily stated by most. However, that is a small portion of the constitution that liberals are attempting have removed from school curriculum.

  49. subtle4mbition
    June 4, 2008 at 4:53 am

    One more thing, just to let you know that asscribing Obama’s political stance to Marx is simply absurd. Please try to come up with something a little more original than “You don’t agree with me so you’re a commie!” Really man, try a little harder.

  50. fredshelm
    June 4, 2008 at 6:58 am

    I’m a historian who specializes in the history and philosophical basis of communism. You cannot tell me that Obama’s personal philosophy has no connection to Marxism. I didn’t spend most of my life studying a philosophy just to have some kid tell me I don’t understand it. Get a clue.

  51. Steve
    June 4, 2008 at 8:23 am

    Actually Fred,
    As someone who is also a Historian ( I teach Government and U.S. History) you sound remarkably like McCarthy during the 50’s. Are you just trying to set up another House Un-American Activities Committee (HUAC) and the traveling circus that followed it? How many scores of people were wrongfully accused and set-up with little to no evidence?

    As a Historian, you should no better to recklessly run your mouth about things that you have NO backing or support for. But, that is the beauty of the Internet. I am patiently awaiting the televised trials of the Hollywood Ten (2008) produced by MTV, with music videos and a making of backstage of who is going to present the awards for biggest commie and best Un-American activity… Then we will have anti-communist congressional committees to wonder what to do about what we haven’t found.

    In the immortal words of Gin Rummy, “the absence of evidence is not the evidence of absence…”

    Good luck on the witch hunt, and if you want information WITH evidence, your friends at http://2oldformaxim.wordpress.com/ can hook you up

    • madehero2007
      August 6, 2010 at 12:26 pm

      I’ve taken multiple history courses, but the teachings that occur within public schools and state universities is quite inadequate. McCarthyism is only similar to the claims of communist followings. However, that is where the similarities stop. Marxism and communism are not seen in the same light today as they were in the 1940s and 1950s. That being said, it is quite pathetic to shrug something off with such a cued comparison. That is a poor habit to get into for a professor or teacher. You are ignoring political stance and purposed legislation simply by mentioning McCarthy, but that does not take away from what Obama suggested during his campaign trail and the legislation that he has passed since election day. His actions suggest that he does follow a Marxist style of governing, which is independent of Joseph McCarthy and McCarthyism. You may call it red baiting, but that is simply you dodging the reality of Obama and the path that he has chosen.

  52. June 4, 2008 at 1:36 pm

    subtle4ambition and Steve:

    Maxist? If not, at least Socialist. Of course, few Democrats other than Waters will admit to being an out ‘n out socialist, but at least one is willing to be honest.

    subtle4ambition, you’re right, one individual won’t change a thing. However, we’re about to see a massive change, all for the worse as those masses who don’t keep up with politics vote in Democrats who will do more damage to our economy in four years than Republican overspending could have done in a century.

    The idiots who deny us the ability to drill for oil, build coal and nuclear plants, or build refineries will continue to cry about our use of energy and our lack of energy independence while they are the very ones who exacerbate the problem. They’ll claim that drilling or building won’t do any good for ’10 years’–the same argument they used in the 70’s, the 80’s, and the 90’s–and a large number of Americans will actually believe them once again.

    The ones who have driven our school system into being a laughing stock will throw more money at it to placate the teacher’s union, interfere with home schooling and teachers who actually take their jobs seriously, and instead of our students being well below the top, they’ll be close to the very bottom by the time they’re done.

    The ones who forced banks to give loans to the poor who couldn’t qualify–and are now screaming the loudest about how greedy the lending institutions are, will once again be demanding more money be given to those poor souls who can’t afford ‘the american dream’. Now, since they’ll have a very sizable majority in both houses, they’ll be looking to steal the money from those who earn it and give to those who don’t–can’t have winners and losers in a PC world, that wouldn’t fit a Socialist model.

    So, subtle4ambition, you’re very right. We’re in for Jimmy Carter’s disaster #2. The question this election isn’t whether Democrats will win or lose, it’s how much damage will they do before the country wakes up in four years and throws them out. Many are expecting a return to the Clinton years, having no idea that what they’re about to elect is 4 years of European socialism. As one of my friends says who lives in France 6 months of the year, “Europe is a great place to visit, but who in their right mind would want to live that way?” We’re about to find out.

  53. fredshelm
    June 4, 2008 at 4:19 pm

    Steve, teaching History does not make you a historian. I tried a stint of sub teaching (I loved it, but the money was terrible) some years ago. One class I taught was biology. Am I now a biologist? No, of course not.

    Please refrain from personal attacks in the future, Steve. If you are attempting a rational argument, they will only detract from it.

    I have not posted evidence of Obama’s ideology, you’re right. Likewise, I have not presented evidence that the sky is blue. Nevertheless, I assure you the sky is blue. If you know what marxism/socialism look like, and you’ve looked at Obama’s policies and language, it is very difficult to reach any other conclusion.

    By the way, Steve the teacher, it’s “know”, not “no”. The other spelling errors I’ll chalk up to typos.

    P.S. Because it is my area of expertise, I will be posting a blog on Obama’s ideology in the near future.

  54. Greg
    June 5, 2008 at 8:03 pm

    Is there a Obamist Manifesto? Is Obama starting revolutions in different parts of the world? Nope. He’s going through the election process like every other president in U.S. history, oh, except for the fact that he is getting more votes than any other president in U.S. history. His policies aren’t as radical as Marx and there aren’t new theories being produced surrounding his policies. You are posting your views and opinions on a blog Fred, not in a book. Get off your high horse and just cast your ballot.

    • madehero2007
      August 6, 2010 at 12:38 pm

      Are you referring to percentage or total vote count? Based on the percentage that he has received, he was far from receiving more votes than any other president in U.S. history. It is also important to note that no individual, even Fred, stated that Obama followed Karl Marx’ philosophies directly. Karl Marx believed in a state of what he referred to as “pure communism.” It is quite clear that Obama supports some of the ideologies presented by Karl Marx. However, I find it quite difficult to take the economic views of someone who was handed money their entire life seriously. Karl Marx purposed economic ideals, but he was handed wealth and inherited further wealth. He knew little about how an economy or a society functions, but other equally ignorant people liked what he had to say. They did not enjoy their lives and wanted something more, so they followed the inaccurate ramblings of someone who promised them more. There are numerous similarities between those that supported Karl Marx and those that support Obama now. He is a man that knows little about economics, foreign affairs, health-care, or the basic infrastructures of our society, and yet people swoon over him and act as if he will fix all of our problems. How can a man with no knowledge have the answers to our problems?

  55. fredshelm
    June 5, 2008 at 8:10 pm

    Greg, thank you for a much more thoughtful comment than the usual death threat or ad hominem rant I receive from Obama supporters.

    He’s not as radical as Marx, this is accurate. Every generation of marxist holds a more diluted ideology than the last. That is encouraging. Your, “Don’t exercise your freedom of speech online!” request could go for you too, or any other blogger. Are you really asking that all bloggers stop blogging? Are you familiar with the first amendment?

    P.S. I am writing a book on marxists, actually.

  56. CJ
    June 8, 2008 at 6:07 pm

    Let us not forget that Obama supporters also say…”you must not be a real Democrat.” That is one of my favorites. As Trump would say…”so shallow.”

  57. June 17, 2008 at 1:05 pm

    Haha! Right on! I’m bookmarking this…

  58. Sandy
    June 18, 2008 at 10:01 am

    Erik, it’s funny you say Clinton supporters won’t engage you on issues. I’ve begged Obama supporters to tell me why they support him…the silence has been deafening!

    I think this is a brilliant piece and perfectly describes OB supporters (which must be why so many of them are angry; it hurts to look in the mirror.

    But you see I don’t blindly support any candidate. I do my research and then make up my mind. Obama’s many flip-flops, his scant knowledge of American history/geography, his paper-thin resume, the sneering tone of his campaign, and his extremely poor judgement on friends and advisors turned me off long ago. Add the vitriol and hatred spewed forth by his supporters and that’s enough for me.

  59. Jr
    June 18, 2008 at 1:15 pm

    Being a very active online supporter for Hillary, I have seen all of these people.. And yes almost everyone of the Obama supporters online fall into these categories, or the guy who said most dont, youre wrong.. Go to some of the major blogs and just sit back and read the pro Obama posts and youll see the light.. I am sorry you have put so much time into a candidate and dont want to see it go to waste, but America is more important.. Letting this racist, crook in the White House would be the worst mistake in the country’s history!!

  60. 89AKurt
    June 27, 2008 at 10:45 pm

    Added to my Flicker “Bitter” American self-portrait.
    "Bitter" American

  61. Eric Swan
    August 18, 2008 at 8:32 am

    I am reminded of Brett Butler’s line: “I think we need a revolution in this country, but I’m afraid that I wouldn’t be able to get decent Mosturizer if we did.”

  62. geriatricmama
    August 25, 2008 at 10:41 am

    This is utterly FANTASTIC!!! Thank you – you will be viewed again and again as I forward this on. Brilliant.

  63. August 31, 2008 at 2:29 pm

    This is fantastic, so good I had to cross post!

  64. Sarah
    September 17, 2008 at 2:56 pm

    Join us in getting a letter out similar to this one….requesting an investigation

    September 10, 2008


    Honorable Diane Feinstein
    Chairman Committee on Rules & Administration
    305 Russell Building
    United States Senate
    Washington, D.C. 20510

    Re: Eligibility of Barrack Hussein Obama to Serve as United States President

    Dear Senator Feinstein,

    My concern for this country, and its future for the right to uphold the Constitution of the United States is the reason I write to you. Even though I am not a constituent of your state, I am a citizen of the USA. Since your responsibility in the position you uphold, as the Chairman of the Committee on Rules and Administration¹, I address this letter to you, and I am requesting a legal investigation be conducted to vet out and thoroughly examine the qualifications and eligibility of Senator Barrack Obama for the position which he seeks; President of our United States and Commander in Chief of our military forces.

    There has been much discussion in the media, and through the Internet of his legalities and whether he is in fact a legal citizen of this country. This is a major concern for citizens in every state to know the facts. If this suspicion proves to be true, then he has defrauded citizens and non-citizens of hundreds of millions of dollars in donations, services, and time not only for his campaign, but from those who have donated to other candidate hopefuls as well.

    The United States Constitution, Article II, Section states:

    “No person except a natural born citizen, or a citizen of the United States, at the time of the adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the office of President; neither shall any person be eligible to that office who shall not have attained to the age of thirty five years, and been fourteen Years a resident within the United States.”

    According to Articles written, the GOP sent a team to Kenya and located a Registration of Birth (Birth Certificate) in Mombasa. Senator Obama’s mother was born November 1942 and therefore was only 18 at the time of Senator Obama’s birth. If in fact Senator

    ¹ The Senate Committee on Rules and Administration is responsible for issues that include election, campaign finance and ethics reform. The Committee provides oversight over such institutions as the Library of Congress, the Smithsonian, and the National Zoo. It also oversees the standing rules of the Senate and administers the Congressional Office Buildings.

    Honorable Diane Feinstein
    Page Two of Two

    Obama was born in Mombosa, Kenya, Senator Obama’s mother was not old enough to meet the residency requirements to register Senator Obama’s birth as “natural born”, only naturalized. A naturalized citizen is not eligible to serve as United States President. I was able to locate the laws on the U.S. Embassy, Kenya website, which state:

    Birth Abroad to One Citizen and One Alien Parent in Wedlock

    A child born abroad to one U.S. citizen parent and one alien parent acquires U.S. citizenship at birth under Section 301(g) INA provided the citizen parent was physically present in the U.S. for the time period required by the law applicable at the time of the child’s birth. (For birth on or after November 14, 1986, a period of five years physical presence, two after the age of fourteen is required. For birth between December 24, 1952 and November 13, 1986, a period of ten years, five after the age of fourteen are required for physical presence in the U.S. to transmit U.S. citizenship to the child.” [emphasis added]

    In addition, Senator Obama was adopted by Lolo Soetoro, a citizen of Indonesia, after he and Senator Obama’s mother married. Senator Obama was registered in a Jakarta School and his citizenship was listed as “Indonesian”. Senator Obama speaks of this adoption and young years in Indonesia in his books.

    As previously stated, there are significant questions into Senator Obama’s citizenship status and his eligibility to serve as our United States President. If these questions are left unanswered, we stand to have a Constitutional crisis.

    Senator Feinstein, you hold the position of Chairman of this Committee and serve on many other important committees of equal significance with much responsibility to perform in a just and honorable means of conduct. The President of the United States is the most important position in which our country is represented to all other nations, and therefore we stand to lose much credibility if Senator Obama does not have the correct credentials to legally support the position for this office as required by our United States Constitution. My request to you is in the thoughts and minds of many citizens at this time, due to the pending Presidential General Election, and therefore this is an urgent matter and needs to be addressed immediately to assuage the fears of a multitude of citizens.

    I require a reply to this wary concern.


    CC: Senator Bob Bennet, Ranking Member

  65. Mark
    December 26, 2008 at 8:21 pm

    LOL!!!!!!! Awesome man, funny as heck, but damn, SO true.

  66. Miss Beck
    January 28, 2009 at 10:35 pm

    You forgot the Hope-Notised.

    Cousins of the Yeswecans….

    Great observations!

  67. Amber
    May 20, 2009 at 10:33 am

    I stumbled upon this by accident, but was very pleased that I did. You are absolutely right in everything you wrote. In retrospect, and in light of Obama’s first accelerated 100+ days what do you think today? Is this whole situation not incredible? Has at least half of this country set America on a free fall of utter chaos and destruction through their own stupidity, irrational Democratic party loyalties, and failure to embrace ethics, morals, and the ability to not lie? Obama’s cabinet is chocked full of tax evaders. The manipulation of the media and them falling all over themselves for Obama would be hilarious if it weren’t so dangerous and irresponsible. The nationalization of multiple industries by people who can’t balance a budget or reign in spending during a time of crisis alludes to questionable leadership qualities or lack there of. This man hates America and the people of this country elected him. I would like to also persue the birth cert issue. I think there was a cover-up that needs to be exposed and maybe then we can be done with Obama pulling the wool over a nation’s eyes once and for all. The term African American, which is what is supposedly stated on his birth cert was not even coined until well after his birth. What happened to that law suit about this issue? Any updates? Keep up the good fight and spread your words. It does help, but I feel it will take a while longer before people become more desperate. In the meantime, keep ’em locked and loaded and don’t forget to stock up.

  68. October 16, 2009 at 12:48 pm

    Having two sisters who are Obama supporters I can relate to the authors story. Someone had done research into how much of a wedge” Obama had driven between families and friends. The findings were unbelievable! Until I got to thniking about all the people I knew and how they related to each other now as opposed to prior to the election.
    He found that the last time there was such a wedge driven this hard in to the hearts of American society, was all the way back to the Civil WAR!
    One of my sisters won’t even speak to me and the other is quite stand offish. Where the discussions of politics could be done with “say” Bill Clinton, “she and my other sister are Democrats, we had healthy back and forth debates. With Obama, HE CAN DO NO WRONG, PERIOD!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    I have tried to get the one who was somewhat in communication to just go back into the facts historically. Look in youtube or Google videos and watch Obama from the beginning of his campaign to the end of his campaign. I told her she will discover the man can’t even remember the lies he told from his last stop! How STUPID can you get to go to Israel and tell the Israelis press you had an uncle in the American Army who was with the liberating force who freed the Jews at the concentration camp in Auschwitz? Auschwitz was liberated by the Red ARMY! He told the same story at a Jewish retirement home in the states!
    How stupid can you be to tell the people in their own house of worship in Selma, Alabama, that your parents were so inspired after watching the march for civil rights in Selma, Alabama that they joined and that is how he came about? HE was born in 1961 and the march took place in 1965!! What an idiot! BUT HIS SUPPORTERS WERE JUST AS MUCH IDIOTS AS he was for believing the story! You can find both of those on youtube (Obama, he can’t do wrong supporters). He dumped his long time friends for political expediency! EXAMPLE: The rev Wright who he claimed was his, mentor, close friend of 17 years, baptized his children, married him and his wife, brought him out of the dark into the light! He dumped him halfway through the campaign because of a controversy in what the press found out which would hut his image! Wright was on the Hannity & Colmes show and spilled the beans on the type of religion he practiced. He quoted some of the books written by people he took his principals from and taught from the pulpit. “James Cone” a Black Theology. Look it up some time…
    It promotes the practiceof being anti-semites, racists and more which put the black people above any other race! Obama practiced this for 20 years and cliamed TOTAL IGNORANCE to the content of the church’s type of sermons! He left the church for political expediency! Remember Obama asking the rev Wright, not to attend a political fund raiser he was having?
    Wright said it’s ok because that way the “Jews will open up their big fat checkbooks!” Can any of you Obama supporters see anything wrong with that picture?
    The press later asked him about that and Obama comments he coud no more get rid of Wrigh than he could an “OLD UNCLE”! Hmmm something is smells here…. don’t you think! But Obama supporters just looked the other way! How about his swearing to have never have even read the Koran? In his own book “Dreams of my father” he wrote about getting in trouble in Koran study class!
    A bet in a bar was made between two people as to who was a bigger liar, Bush or Obama. In the researcn done going all the back to the first campaign Bush ran all the way to his leaving office, he looked like the student, not the professor. Obama told more lies starting from his first day announcing he was running for president, than Bush did his whole 8 year term. Bush could have campaigned for Pope in comparison!

    Barack HUSSEIN Obama is a very brilliant man and a public speaker so captivating that the last time the world had seen one it was back in 1933!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    I think his name was UH…Aldolph Hitler???? Didn’t he tell the people what they wanted to hear too? Didn’t he promise them what ever it was that would sway their beliefs his way to the point that only HE WAS CAPABLE OF SAVING THE COUNTRY AND THE>>>>>>>WORLD!!!!!!!!!!!
    You know the saying’ “History repeats it self?” Well folks, we have all the warning signs in front of us, it’s just a matter whether or not we wish to believe them. God help us if most people decide to stick their heads in the sand!

  69. October 16, 2009 at 2:11 pm

    Lets us not forget he is an honorable man! He signed an agreement with John Mccain as to the type of campaign financing he would use. He lied to McCain two times, telling McCain he was sticking with the agreement as his campaign contributions kept building well past McCains. By the time McCain knew what Obama had done to him, it was too late to build upto the same. Obama now had the funds to where was able to place campain headquarters in even tiny towns accross our nation. McCain couldn’t match that. A radio station did an experiment with the two candidte sites where you could donate using your charge cards. On Obama’s site, you were asked for the number on the card, expiration date, name as it was on the card and how much the donation was for and they processed the card.
    On McCain’s site, they asked for the same information, however, the card would not be processed without the three digit code on the back of the card. That code was placed there for your security! Hmm makes me wonder why there was more than one incident where there were complaints of being billed on Obama’s site?
    The campaign sites were suppose to show the sources of the donations and the amount donation. McCain’s site was open giving full acces to the entire list. Obama’s site would only allow access to 50%…….I wonder WHY????? Obama supporters, THESE ARE FACTS! CHECK UP ON THEM!
    THIS IS A DEMONSTRATION OF HOW HONORABLE THE MAN IS THAY YOU PUT IN OFFICE!!! When his win was announced in Chicago, Mark Davis from WPAP was standing in the crowd live on the air. Just as he was announced the winner, a woman just a few feet away from him was cheering wildly and said that now she didn’t have to pay her house mortage or the payment on her car! She didn’t even have to worry about coming up with money for gas! JUST WHAT DID THE PEOPLE WHO GOT THIS LADY TO REGISTER AS A VOTER, TELL HER??????????AND, WHAT DID THEY TELL OTHER PEOPLE TO GET THEIR VOTES FOR OBAMA?
    Obama had told the city of Chicago that he would pay for the party held in the Chicago streets when he was announced the winner…..
    Chicago has been trying to get him to pay the 1.7 million dollars and he has been playing the “Leroy’s not home” bit with the people from Chicago!
    Any guesses as to how much money he paid his campaign finance manager? How about $90 million dollars! Just who was this campaign manager?????? Hmm I know!! It was Franklin Reins, the same guy who defrauded the American tax payers out of $91 million dollars (the story was in Readers Digest May or June issue) Reins had been giving Obama money from Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac all during the time he was in charge of it. Obama was the largest recipient of money from Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac……you know that THING that collapsed and sent our country into a wild tail spin that Obama harped on through his entire campaign, blaming Bush and McCain for>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    This very honorable man is the very one who had managed to throw every one of his opponents off the ballot of his first run for office so he just went S..L…I..D..E..I..N..G into office unopposed! Google “Obama plays chicago hardball” You can read about all the throats he cut and people he stepped on! Yes we are talking HONORABLE HERE, the man who can do no wrong!
    Why, even the people who helped make him prosper, he had no quams of cutting their throats as well! Read about Alice Palmer and what she had done for him and what he did to her in return. Oh well, that’s loyalty for you. If he does that to friends, imagine what he would do if he didn’t like you? Or for that matter if he just didn’t know you? OOOOPPPS, that cat is out of the bag now! He doesn’t know 99% or more of the people who put their faith in him and voted for him! YES, that is you, and for gessing right, you get another bowl of STUPID to eat tommorow moning!
    Did you know that in his first campaign for office, he didn’t have an uncle who freed the Jews in Auschwitz? He had a grandfather who was with General George S Patton! Be sure to see this one on youtube>>>>>>>
    “The Obama Iraq Documentary”, get some popcorn, be sure to wear your hip boots because it gets DEEP! This is one of the best videos in the campaign, don’t miss it! LIAR LIAR PANTS ON FIRE! In all honesty. I am just dumbfounded as to how people, educated people, some, VERY EDUCATED people actually voted for the man when it was so obvious that he would be standing in front of thousands of people telling lies which anyone who had taken history in hight school would have caught! The media would jump on McCain if he even Msspelled a word, yet Obama could spin yarns and get away with it.
    It is still beyond belief as to how congress allowed him into the White House by accepting a “Certificate of live birth”. Hospitals issue Birth Certificates! If you loose your “Birth Certificate” You can request a copy of your birth certificate! Certificates of live birh?????? Come on now….
    Who was smokeing what?

  70. Kriss
    February 12, 2010 at 10:18 am

    Halarious, and I know alot of people who fit that description. Anyone over reacting to this obviously doesn’t understand the half joking manner this was published in. Come on people, he’s not 100% serious! At least thats how I took it. Still funny, and scarringly partialy true.

  1. June 3, 2008 at 9:03 pm
  2. June 4, 2008 at 12:31 am
  3. June 7, 2008 at 5:58 pm
  4. June 19, 2008 at 5:54 am
  5. August 17, 2008 at 6:29 pm
  6. August 26, 2008 at 12:31 am

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: