Home > Myth, Obama > Obama Vs. Liberalism?

Obama Vs. Liberalism?

As a conservative, I’m getting quite sick of seeing Obama further desecrate the term, “Liberal”.  The far-left has been pushing liberalism further and further to the fringe for decades, but Obama just took it on a giant leap.  I’m equally sick of seeing my Liberal friends look at Obama and question their very core values simply because they share the label.  Obama is not a Liberal.

Let me explain what I mean by that.

Liberalism:

2 a: often capitalized : a movement in modern Protestantism emphasizing intellectual liberty and the spiritual and ethical content of Christianity b: a theory in economics emphasizing individual freedom from restraint and usually based on free competition, the self-regulating market, and the gold standard c: a political philosophy based on belief in progress, the essential goodness of the human race, and the autonomy of the individual and standing for the protection of political and civil liberties.

See any Obama policies in there?  Neither did I.  But just in case, let’s take a closer look:

1.  a movement in modern Protestantism emphasizing intellectual liberty and the spiritual and ethical content of Christianity

Nope.  What religious path did Obama choose instead?  Reverend Wright.

2.  a theory in economics emphasizing individual freedom from restraint and usually based on free competition, the self-regulating market, and the gold standard

This describes economic Liberals.  In the U.S., conservatives are economically liberal.  Needless to say, Obama is not a conservative.  While he has flip flopped a total of 4 times (and counting) on free trade, untold times on taxes, his voting record has always been against free trade and for higher taxes.

3.  a political philosophy based on belief in progress,

Obama made very clear in his historic speech on race that America was still full of racism.  Obama isn’t just someone who “believes” in progress, he denies that it is possible when he’s looking right at it.

4.  the essential goodness of the human race

Obama:  “So it’s not surprising then that they [people in small towns] get bitter, they cling to guns or religion or antipathy to people who aren’t like them or anti-immigrant sentiment or anti-trade sentiment as a way to explain their frustrations.”

5.  and the autonomy of the individual

I think Michelle Obama described her husband’s approach best:  “Barack will never allow you to go back to your lives as usual, uninvolved, uninformed”.

And, from Obama’s own website:

Require 100 Hours of Service in College: Obama and Biden will establish a new American Opportunity Tax Credit that is worth $4,000 a year in exchange for 100 hours of public service a year.

6.  standing for the protection of political and civil liberties.

Obama won’t even stand up for the lives of infants, let alone any of the issues he is supposedly for.  How else can we explain his present votes on abortion and his claim that holding a concrete position on the subject is “above his pay grade”.

Indeed, how else can we explain any of his failures to fit with any of the many different possible forms of Liberalism except that he simply is NOT A LIBERAL.

So then, what is he?  A socialist of the worst sort, and maybe, just maybe, the future leader of the free world.  Let’s hope not.

Categories: Myth, Obama
  1. Jim Gilliam
    September 23, 2008 at 4:52 pm

    The current economic crisis has ushered in European Socialism and it was done in a Republican administration. Reagan’s trickle down economic ideologies are dead.

  2. Bouncy Atheist
    October 1, 2008 at 11:26 am

    Great post! I too am getting sick of the “guilt by association” with the liberal name. Liberalism isn’t socialism or communism, but with the way politics have been going its clear few people know the difference.

  3. RUFUS
    October 6, 2008 at 6:22 pm

    Would public service be credited for going out into the community and registering homeless folks to vote, and taking them to the polls to vote Democrat?

  4. Connie
    October 30, 2008 at 10:39 am

    Jim – The current economic crisis is shared by the executive branch AND the Democrat – repeat Democrat – congress. This is no reason to put another quasi-Democrat (definition here: Socialist) in the White House! In fact, it is a great reason NOT to.

  1. No trackbacks yet.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

%d bloggers like this: